Star
Trek
has
been
an
important
fixture
of
sci-fi
TV
for
decades,
and
alongside
its
continued
existence,
movies
have
helped
further
flesh
out
the
characters.
But
in
both
the
movies
and
TV,
the
early
2000s
weren’t
kind
to
the
franchise:
2002's
Star
Trek:
Nemesis
was
a
critical
and
commercial
disaster,
and
Star
Trek:
Enterprise
had
a
respectable
four-season
run,
but
the
shortest
of
the
shows
since
the
original
series.
Change
was
in
order,
and
it
was
eventually
decided
that
would
take
the
form
of
a
reboot
that
took
everyone
by
surprise.
Star Trek—that is, the reboot film released May 8, 2009—is one of those movies that showed up at just the right moment. At the time, movies based on old TV shows like Starsky & Hutch and Charlie’s Angels had found commercial successes, which gave this reboot some cultural context. It also helped that it was being helmed by a trio of filmmakers who knew how to make hits: J.J. Abrams was still riding the high off directing Mission: Impossible 3 (speaking of movies based on old TV shows), along with the almost-ended Lost and the still young Fringe. Writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman had written Mission and were further on Paramount’s good side with the first Transformers movie. If there was anyone who could make a new Star Trek flick that’d get anyone’s attention, for better or worse, it’d be these guys.
It really can’t be understated how much Paramount was banking on this new Star Trek being a hit back then. The studio wanted, more than anything, to get audiences to care about Star Trek again, and how best to do that in the 2000s? By hyping up its action scenes and Kirk being quite the ladies man. That didn’t entirely go over well, much like Abrams’ comments that the movie would mainly be for non-Trekkies. Even with that, the movie couldn’t help but look interesting. Those trailers didn’t tell you a dang thing about its actual plot, but they had good vibes, and made you want to see how the Enterprise crew would come to be the adventurers our parents and grandparents had fallen in love with back in their day.
Star Trek - Trailer
And fall in love, people did: the reboot movie was met with critical acclaim and later four Academy Award nominations, ultimately winning one for Best Makeup and being the only Trek movie to net an Oscar. Despite mixed reactions on the movie splitting off into its own timeline, critics and audiences loved the young cast’s takes on the original characters—especially Zachary Quinto’s Spock and Zoe Saldana’s Uhura—and their chemistry. With a $385.7 million box office, Star Trek succeeded in making people care about the franchise once more. But its high ended up coming down quicker than you’d think, and in the years since, the movies have been marooned in space.
A few years later, 2013's Star Trek Into Darkness left an odd taste in audiences’ mouths. It still made money, but something about it felt off: maybe it was how it did a more convoluted retelling of Wrath of Khan, or maybe it can be owed to its very weird B-plot with 9/11 parallels that feel like they belong in a completely different movie (or another franchise entirely). Star Trek Beyond, conversely, went for a considerably simpler approach and just functioned like a regular episode of the show. That energy, combined with a still-incredible needle drop, was the right move, even if the film wasn’t a smash hit when it dropped in 2016. Paramount’s spent years trying to get a fourth movie off the ground since then, and it’s anyone’s guess as to if it’ll actually happen.
Things have gone much better over in TV land: Star Trek: Discovery and Lower Decks, a pair of well-liked shows, are both ending after their respective fifth seasons—a run that feels like a miracle these days. Star Trek: Picard gave Next Generation fans the legacy sequel they’d been wanting for years, and Star Trek: Prodigy, despite how messily its schedule was handled, brought younger audiences into the fold. It’s Star Trek: Strange New Worlds that’ll be spearheading future TV plans, which currently include a Starfleet Academy show and the Paramount+ film focused on Michelle Yeoh’s Discovery character Phillipa Georgiou.
Image: Paramount
Star
Trek
2009's
biggest
aftershock
came
outside
of
its
franchise
with
the
big
reboot
and
legacy
sequel
boom
of
the
2010s.
New
takes
on
Teenage
Mutant
Ninja
Turtles,
Power
Rangers,
RoboCop,
and
Evil
Dead
were
born
from
this
movie’s
success,
even
if
it
was
just
to
revitalize
its
own
series.
Abrams,
Orci,
and
Kurtzman
went
on
to
become
even
bigger
names
in
Hollywood:
the
former
famously
went
on
to
revive
Star
Wars
for
the
big
screen,
and
is
a
producing
powerhouse.
Orci
and
Kurtzman
went
on
to
be
involved
with
the
Amazing
Spider-Man
movies,
and
create
or
executive
produce
shows
like
Sleepy
Hollow
and
Fringe.
When
the
duo
separated,
Kurtzman—following
his
directorial
debut
The
Mummy,
which
failed
to
launch
Universal’s
Dark
Universe—effectively
became
Star
Trek’s
equivalent
to
Kevin
Feige.
Orci,
last
we
heard,
was
writing
a
Spider-Man
adjacent
movie
for
Sony
that’s
gone
quiet
in
the
years
since
its
announcement.
All-in-all, Star Trek was a game-changer, and for better or worse, you don’t get our current movie landscape without it. With how big the franchise is right now, it’s understandable why Paramount’s wanted so much to get a fourth film off the ground—but is it possible by this point? That hypothetical (and surprising) Star Trek 4 has been waylaid by shifting creatives for years, to the point you feel like someone should finally make the call to pull the plug. Not only did Beyond give the Kelvin universe its cleanest end after the passings of Anton Yelchin and Leonard Nimoy, fourth movies can sometimes be dicey, especially when their franchise wasn’t really built with it in mind. And it’s anyone’s guess as to if a Starfleet prequel set in the same timeline will rejuvenate it for more films or just be a small detour before we head back to Prime time.
In 2022, Chris Pine said the best way forward for Star Trek movies may require they be less bombastic, more geared toward fans, and cost less to make. It’s an easy sentiment to get behind, and that may really only be possible by junking Trek 4 and doing it with another movie. The Enterprise of the Kelvinverse had a good run, and after 15 years, it’s more than fine to boldly go in a new direction.
Want
more
io9
news?
Check
out
when
to
expect
the
latest
Marvel,
Star
Wars,
and
Star
Trek
releases,
what’s
next
for
the
DC
Universe
on
film
and
TV,
and
everything
you
need
to
know
about
the
future
of
Doctor
Who.
When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.
Comments